It is 1687. Kit Tyler is an independent girl who is forced to leave her home in Barbados to come to the new and rough country of America. What she finds there is very different from what she expected. But with her new family and a few special friends, Kit finds a deeper meaning to life and discovers more about her true self in the process.
This is the story of the life of one boy, written in the style of an autobiography. His life was not particularly exciting, but full of it’s own trials and triumphs, as all lives are.
C. S. Lewis considered George MacDonald to be a master of fairy tales, and I agree with him. Seldom have I seen such a fertile imagination that is shown in George MacDonald’s stories. And not all fairy tales have such deep meaning as is shown in these stories either.
“Misty’s Twilight” is my least favorite book in the “Misty” series. Strange, that a book in such a great series would be so different, and actually so much worse than the others. The reason is that this book also was based on real people and events, and these people weren’t as endearing as the other ones.
Misty’s back! Now she is heavy with foal, but a sudden storm blasts across Chincoteague and wipes out entire towns in it’s rage. Chincoteague is in a crisis, and so are the ponies of Assateague. No-one has a home to go to, Typhoid warnings are out, and Misty is over-due. Now what?
This is the sequel to “Misty of Chincoteague”. In this book, Paul and his sister Maureen are asked to make a hard decision that might wrench their hearts out. Suddenly, in the midst of their sorrow, a tiny brown bundle of joy fights it’s way into their hearts. But even that little bit of joy is threatened by the harshness of nature. Is is possible that Paul and Maureen will have their comfort torn away from them as soon as they find it?
“Misty of Chincoteague” won the Newbery Honor in 1948. It is a timeless classic- yada yada yada. OK, so you’ve probably heard all about that. Everyone coos over “Misty of Chincoteague”, but why? what’s so great about it?
So, if you have read the first part of this review, you know why I like “The Lord of the Rings”. But that’s just me. The real question is, why should *you* read it? Find out why in this part of the review
“The Lord of the Rings”. The whole world was inflamed with madness, it seemed, when LOTR hit the theaters. I suppose I caught it too, because I LOVE it! Here is a book that is a long read, deep with meaning, full of awesome characters with no weak bridges. It is everything I love about a book and nothing I don’t like.
Of course, having been through “The Lord of the Rings” mania of the early 2000s, most people probably know the name “hobbit”. Most have probably heard of the prequel to LOTR, “The Hobbit”. But is it really all it’s cracked up to be? I say Yes! and a resounding Yes at that!